Journal of the House of Representatives of the United States,

SATURDAY, June 28, 1856.

The Speaker having stated, as the business first in order, the bill of the House (H. R. 411) for the admission of the State of Kansas into the Union, heretofore reported from the Committee on the Territories, the pending question being on the motion of Mr. Dunn to commit the same to the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union,

After debate,

Mr. Stephens moved to amend the said motion to commit, by adding thereto the following, viz: with instructions to amend the said bill by striking out all after the enacting clause, and inserting in lieu thereof the following, viz:

 

The Senate Journal of  July 8, 1856 expands on this same topic. The interesting aspect about this particular House journal entry though. Is that it sets aside the doctrine by the current Supreme Court, of incorporation of Amendment II, doesn't it? For, it is quite apparent that both the House and Senate felt that the people were entitled to the right to keep and bear arms. In addition, that the right was secured from infringement from both the federal AND state government(s). Bearing in mind that we are a Constitutional Republic. How could what we witness here in 1856, possibly be changed to what is claimed by our government(s) today?

The Congress is the body that makes the laws, and the court is charged with interpreting the laws, correct? Tell me, is there any possible way that what is written above can be misinterpreted? Personally, I perceive of no way that it can. It shows that the clear intention of Amendment II is that The Right of The People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall NOT be Infringed. Now doesn't it? In addition to all of that, there is not one mention of militia is there? Which goes right in line with what was stated in the Senate Journal of July 8th.

And, would you take a look at what the U.S. Supreme Court thought the same year;

"It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union . . .the full liberty . . .to keep and carry arms wherever they went."

"More especially, it cannot be believed that the large slaveholding States regarded them as included in the word citizens, or would have consented to a Constitution which might compel them to receive them in that character from another State. For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went."

- Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).

It should be plain for all to see that most of our government(s) have exceeded their Constitutionally delegated authority. They are infringing upon our God-given Natural and inalienable Right. Instead of securing it, as the House and Senate of 1856 did for their constituents. The current Constitutionally perverse infringements need to stop, and they need to stop now. And ALL 'gun control' 'laws' need to be immediately overturned. All such laws are Repugnant to We The Peoples Constitution, and therefore rightfully should be declared NULL and VOID. These people in our governments are our servants, not our masters. They don't tell us what OUR Constitution means, We tell them. We The People ARE, clothed with OUR Constitution, the "Final", "Legitimate" and "Ultimate" authority.

Return to:

After The Fact

Also see:

Right to Keep and Bear Arms -

Origins

Precedent

HOME

 2006 GunShowOnTheNet.com